Case 2301580/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L T K Nielsen v Norwegian Air Resources UK Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301580/2021
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L T K Nielsen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal reconsidered the dismissal judgment dated 10 September 2021 on the claimant's application and revoked it. The judgment records that the Tribunal had issued the dismissal judgment in error.
The reason given was an administrative error: Tribunal staff believed that the claimant had withdrawn his claim against the respondent. The Tribunal found that it had been incorrect to issue a dismissal judgment and stated that further instructions and hearing details about the claim would be provided in due course. No substantive claim outcome or remedy was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a Rule 70 reconsideration decision revoking an earlier dismissal judgment issued in error; it does not determine the substantive claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 70 the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.