Case 2301599/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Ulfik v Prs Cleaning Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301599/2020
- Decision date
- 3 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Ulfik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment in Ms J Ulfik v Prs Cleaning Limited, Employment Judge Abbott Date found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £672.00 in respect of that claim.
The Tribunal also found that the respondent had acted in breach of contract to the claimant's detriment and ordered damages of £2,000.00. It dismissed the claimant's claim for damages or injury to feelings, stress and emotional harm on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction to make such an award.
The claimant's application for a costs order was dismissed because none of the circumstances in Rule 76 applied. The hearing listed for 8 March 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross/net sum of £672.00 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £672 |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found breach of contract to the claimant's detriment and ordered damages of £2,000.00. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Other | The claim for damages or injury to feelings, stress and emotional harm was dismissed because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to make such an award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,672
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.