Case 2301610/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Sathees Kumar v Ashtons Hospital Pharmacy Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301610/2024
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Sathees Kumar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the Claimant failed to comply with the Unless Order of Employment Judge Evans dated 10 January 2025. As a result, the Claimant's claims were automatically dismissed by operation of that order with effect from 1 February 2025.
This decision does not include any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims, and it records no award of compensation or other remedy. The decision was sent to the parties on 10 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type taken from the GOV.UK listing category supplied in the case context; the judgment text itself does not name the underlying causes of action. The claim was automatically dismissed by operation of the Unless Order dated 10 January 2025. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim type taken from the GOV.UK listing category supplied in the case context; the judgment text itself does not name the underlying causes of action. The claim was automatically dismissed by operation of the Unless Order dated 10 January 2025. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.