Case 2301629/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dobson v London Fire Commissioner — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301629/2021
- Decision date
- 13 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dobson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a firefighter and had a history of lengthy absences, including a final period of absence from January 2019 until dismissal. The respondent progressed him through its sickness capability process, obtained occupational health advice, considered redeployment and ill-health retirement issues, and held a stage three capability meeting and appeal. The claimant was dismissed on notice for capability/non-attendance.
The tribunal accepted that the reason for dismissal was capability, not misconduct. It found that the respondent's decision-makers considered the claimant's attendance history, the occupational health view that past attendance patterns were often reliable predictors of future attendance, his service-related injury, his long service, his fitness to return at the point of dismissal, and the operational effect of keeping him in the long-term sickness pool.
The tribunal concluded that the respondent had waited a substantial period, had not applied its policy rigidly, and was not required to wait longer for a GP report where the claimant had already been assessed as fit for work. It found that dismissal and the process followed fell within the range of reasonable responses open to the employer, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The pleaded reason was ill-health capability/non-attendance, and the claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
14 references- s.98(1)(b) and (2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- range of reasonable responses
- NC Watling and Co Ltd v Richardson
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Foley v Post Office; HSBC Bank plc v Madden
- Royal Bank of Scotland v McAdie
- Spencer v Paragon Wallpapers Ltd
- Monmouthshire County Council v Harris
- S v Dundee City Council
- O'Brien v Bolton St Catherine's Academy
- Post Office v Stones
- Kelly v Royal Mail Group Ltd
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.