Case 2301632/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Padun v Arcstream Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301632/2022
- Decision date
- 8 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Padun
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim against the second respondent, Neil Dickinson. It held that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because there is no jurisdiction permitted for the heads of claim brought by the claimant against a named individual.
The claim against the first respondent, Arcstream Ltd, was not disposed of by this judgment and was said to continue. The hearing listed for 02 March 2023 remained in place.
No merits findings were made and no remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records that the claim against the second respondent, Neil Dickinson, was struck out. It says there is no jurisdiction permitted for the heads of claim brought by the claimant against a named individual, but it does not specify those heads in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.