Case 2301634/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N D'Angeli v Advanced Energy Performance Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301634/2023
- Decision date
- 15 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N D'Angeli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined on a Rule 21 basis because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made in accordance with rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £6,350 gross. It also upheld the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,650 gross damages.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,284 gross. The judgment states that this was calculated on the basis that the claimant was 32 years old when made redundant and had worked for the respondent for four years.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,410.64 net. The total sum payable was £12,694.64, and the claimant was directed to account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of amounts received from the respondent under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £6,350 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,350 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,650 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £2,650 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,284 gross, calculated by reference to his age of 32 and four years' service. | Upheld | — | £2,284 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,410.64 net. | Upheld | — | £1,411 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,695
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.