Case 2301656/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Charles v Anne Manohari Luxmikah Fernando — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301656/2022
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Charles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 13 May 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the material facts recorded in the judgment, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The judgment does not set out a further breakdown of the deduction calculation, but it records that the amount due was £700.00 gross.
The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £700.00 in total. No separate award for interest or any other remedy is recorded in the extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £700.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.