Case 2301659/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs P Broom v Evanscare Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 2301659/2019
Decision date: 27 October 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Khalil
Venue: London South

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs P Broom

Respondent

Evanscare Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal, sitting alone, found that Mrs P Broom's claim for constructive unfair dismissal under ss.94, 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded. It awarded a basic award of £2,897.37 and a compensatory award of £2,833.46, the latter comprising £2,483.46 for loss of earnings and £350 for loss of statutory protection.

The Tribunal also found in the claimant's favour on an unauthorised deductions claim for 6 November 2018 under s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £91.98. It further upheld the holiday pay claim, described as unauthorised deductions and a breach of Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and awarded £459.90.

In addition, the Tribunal made an extra award of two weeks' pay under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 because, on the evidence before it, the claimant did not have an up-to-date statement of employment particulars when the claim was issued. That additional award was £551.88. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment was £6,834.59.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	Constructive unfair dismissal under ss.94/95/98 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was awarded a basic award of £2,897.37 and a compensatory award of £2,833.46, made up of £2,483.46 for loss of earnings and £350 for loss of statutory protection.	Upheld	—	£5,731
Unlawful deduction from wages	Unauthorised deductions claim for 6 November 2018 under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996.	Upheld	—	£92
Holiday pay	Unauthorised deductions claim for holiday pay under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 and breach of Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.	Upheld	—	£460
Other	Additional award of two weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002 because, on the evidence before the Tribunal, the claimant did not have an up-to-date statement of employment particulars when the claim was issued.	Upheld	—	£552

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £6,835; across all upheld claims
Basic award: £2,897; statutory, unfair dismissal
Compensatory award: £2,833; compensatory remedy recorded

Legal tests applied

6 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.