Case 2301669/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stefano Tortelli v STR 48 Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301669/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hamour
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stefano Tortelli
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as an Executive Chef by the respondent, a hospitality business running four restaurants. The respondent did not attend the hearing, but the tribunal was satisfied that notice of hearing had been sent and proceeded with the claimant present. The claimant confirmed that no claim was being pursued in respect of overtime or alleged working hours, apart from the pleaded issues of holiday pay, notice or wages, and expenses.
The tribunal found that the claimant had accrued untaken holiday from 2020/21 and 2021/22. It accepted that coronavirus-related provisions and the respondent's confirmation allowed the 2020/21 leave to be carried forward, and that accrued untaken leave should have been paid in lieu on termination. The tribunal limited the calculation to the figures advanced by the claimant and awarded £5,262 for holiday pay.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant was not paid, or not paid in full, for the notice period he worked, and awarded the amount claimed of £1,899. It also accepted that a final expenses claim of £330 had been approved and was due. The tribunal found that the holiday pay, notice pay, and expenses were wages, that the claimant had not consented to the deductions, and that there was no contractual or statutory basis shown for them; the claims therefore succeeded and the total award was £7,491.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Award for 38.66 days accrued and untaken holiday at termination, including carried-forward leave. | Upheld | — | £5,262 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay/unpaid salary for the notice period worked; the tribunal also treated the sum as wages for Employment Rights Act purposes. | Upheld | — | £1,899 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid expenses claim approved by telephone and found due and payable; treated as wages by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £330 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,491
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Working Time (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2020
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften eV v Shimizu
- LB v TO
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.