Case 2301673/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. O. Frost v Cochin Textiles Limited Hearing at: London South Croydon — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301673/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. O. Frost
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sage, sitting alone at London South Croydon on 2 October 2019, heard the claim with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £6,300 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed on 28 February 2019 by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £13,716. The judgment does not record any further issues, legal tests, or separate breakdown of the award beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £6,300. | Upheld | — | £6,300 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed on 28 February 2019 by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £13,716. | Upheld | — | £13,716 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,016
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.