Case 2301677/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 2301677/2017 v Mr M Sinclair XPO Logistics — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301677/2017
- Decision date
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 2301677/2017
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr M Sinclair's claim against XPO Logistics under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The Tribunal relied on rule 37(1)(d), which permits strike out where a claim has not been actively pursued.
The reasons record that on 1 March 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 15 March 2024, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim; it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.