Case 2301678/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Damaris Arguello v Dan Café Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301678/2020
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Damaris Arguello
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to Dan Café Limited and found that the claimant was a worker of the respondent. It dismissed the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages.
The claimant's holiday pay claim succeeded. The tribunal found that she had only been paid in lieu for one day's holiday, namely £66, but was entitled to three days' holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent was ordered to pay £132 for the additional accrued but untaken holiday.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant was found entitled to three days' holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, having only been paid in lieu for one day's holiday (£66). | Upheld | — | £132 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £132
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.