Case 2301679/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Priscott v Elliott Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301679/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Priscott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Croydon by cloud video platform on 23 March 2021 before Employment Judge Nash. The claimant did not attend, and the respondent was represented by Mr T Brennan, Senior Advisor.
Because the claimant did not attend the hearing, the tribunal dismissed the complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and unauthorised deduction of wages. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this as a complaint for unauthorised deduction of wages and dismisses it because the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.