Case 2301687/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Ms J Charalambous - Peninsula — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301687/2020
- Decision date
- 4 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing on 4 February 2022 at which the claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by Ms J Charalambous of Peninsula. The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend the claim to add a mental disability, noting that the original claim form presented on 26 April 2020 had proceeded on the basis that being left-handed was the disability relied upon, and that the supposed mental disability was not clearly identified.
The tribunal found that the claimant had withdrawn the left-handedness basis for the claim. In consequence, and because the amendment application failed, there was no extant disability claim and the claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal said that, in the alternative, it would have struck out the claim in any event for failure actively to pursue it and for repeated non-compliance with tribunal orders.
The tribunal also recorded that a deposit order had been made on 10 February 2021 requiring payment of £10 within 28 days, sent to the parties on 19 February 2021 and therefore due on 19 March 2021. The deposit was paid on 7 April 2021, and the tribunal said the claim should have been struck out at that point. The judgment therefore concluded with the claim being struck out and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant originally relied on being left-handed as the disability. His application dated 25/2/2021 to amend the claim to add an unspecified mental disability was refused. The tribunal found that he had withdrawn the left-handedness basis, leaving no extant disability claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.