Case 2301698/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v C de Faria v The Black Cab Café Ltd and The Black Cab Coffee Company — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301698/2020
- Decision date
- 25 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sage issued this Rule 21 judgment on 25 September 2020 against The Black Cab Café Limited and The Black Cab Coffee Company. The tribunal found that the respondents had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £580 gross, together with an additional £175.40 compensation for that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £580 damages. On the unfair dismissal claim, it found in the claimant's favour and awarded a basic award of £580 and a compensatory award of £15,080 gross, to be paid net.
The extracted judgment gives no further narrative of the facts or reasons beyond those orders. The overall monetary orders recorded in the judgment total £16,995.40.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered £580 gross for the unauthorised deduction from wages and a further £175.40 as additional compensation for that deduction. | Upheld | — | £755 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £580. | Upheld | — | £580 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £580 and a compensatory award of £15,080 gross, to be paid net. | Upheld | — | £15,660 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,995
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £580
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £15,080
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.