Case 2301699/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Trokhymiuk v TDH Limited t/a SUN STUDIO London — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301699/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Trokhymiuk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was decided under Rule 21 after TDH Limited t/a SUN STUDIO London failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Sudra determined that a determination could properly be made on the papers. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr S Trokhymiuk, succeeded in his complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £2,772.00 gross. The amount was calculated as 154 hours owed at the rate of £18.00 per hour. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages of £2,772.00 gross, calculated as 154 hours at £18.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,772 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,772
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.