Case 2301700/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Gooden (Solicitor (Australian Qualified) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301700/2022
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. It ordered J Kay Pub Ltd to pay £1,692.24 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant’s breach of contract claim relating to unpaid expenses. It ordered the respondent to pay £77.45 for that head of claim, making the total payable £1,769.69. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction from wages upheld; respondent ordered to pay £1,692.24 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,692 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract in respect of unpaid expenses upheld; respondent ordered to pay £77.45. | Upheld | — | £77 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,770
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.