Case 2301708/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Oldham v Response TM Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301708/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Oldham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr D Oldham's claim against Response TM Limited. The judgment records that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not successfully applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal also noted that on 10 July 2023 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason, and the tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. The tribunal struck out the claim because the respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not successfully applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies, and the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 10 July 2023 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.