Case 2301709/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Anderson v Endeavour Land & New Homes Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301709/2021
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 March 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr J Anderson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 15 September 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Anderson did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Wright struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded heads of claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim in full for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 15 September 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued; individual heads were not separately analysed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim in full for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 15 September 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued; individual heads were not separately analysed. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim in full for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 15 September 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued; individual heads were not separately analysed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim in full for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 15 September 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued; individual heads were not separately analysed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim in full for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 15 September 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued; individual heads were not separately analysed. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.