Case 2301712/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Ruddock v Closer To Limited (substituted for Hey Human Limited) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301712/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sekhon Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Ruddock
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment grants the Claimant's application to substitute Closer To Limited as the Respondent in place of Hey Human Limited. It then records that the complaints of direct disability discrimination, direct race discrimination, direct sex discrimination, and direct pregnancy discrimination are dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant.
The judgment does not determine those complaints on their merits. It states that the Claimant's remaining claims will proceed to a final hearing on 31 July 2023, so no substantive findings or remedy were made on the withdrawn complaints in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records this complaint as dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records this complaint as dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records this complaint as dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records this complaint as dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.