Case 2301714/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Jenner v Compare care Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301714/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Jenner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 15 April 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£379.20 gross) and had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement (£443.00 gross). The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with payslips pursuant to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the claim under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 succeeded, with the minimum award of 2 weeks' pay (£150.00 gross) ordered.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £972.20 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 determination; respondent failed to present a valid response. Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £379.20 gross. | Upheld | — | £379 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered payment of £443.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £443 |
| Other | Failure to provide written statement/payslips. Tribunal referenced section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. Minimum award of 2 weeks' pay (£150.00 gross) granted. Closest §4.4 enum would be a written statement claim; classified as 'other' as the locked taxonomy has no specific written-statement category. | Upheld | — | £150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £972
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.