Case 2301720/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Ferlin v La Salle Education Ltd HELD AT: Croydon Employment Tribunal (By CVP) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301720/2025
- Decision date
- 12 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Ferlin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a claim by Ms C Ferlin against La Salle Education Ltd heard by CVP at Croydon Employment Tribunal on 12 June 2025 before Employment Judge Buckley. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Tudor, a consultant.
The judgment states that the claim for breach of contract, identified as unpaid notice pay, was dismissed. The written record does not provide reasons beyond noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states that the claim was for breach of contract, specifically unpaid notice pay, and that it was dismissed. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.