Case 2301731/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Harrington v Certa Precision Engineering Limited FINAL HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301731/2020
- Decision date
- 19 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Harrington
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Harrington brought a claim for the sums set out in her schedule of loss, supported by documentation. The tribunal recorded that those were the sums awarded. It also noted that the schedule included a calculation of loss for unfair dismissal, but unfair dismissal was not claimed and no compensation was awarded on that basis.
The respondent did not return an ET3. Mr Khan said it had been returned, but the tribunal recorded that the response was late and there was no record of it having been accepted. The tribunal therefore proceeded on the basis that the ET3 had not been accepted and did not hear the respondent's defence that the claimant was not employed by the respondent.
The tribunal awarded net sums of £1,550.40 for notice pay and £1,614.00 for redundancy pay, making a total award of £3,164.40. Mr Khan did not dispute the figures claimed for those sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded in the net amount claimed. The respondent did not dispute the figure. | Upheld | — | £1,550 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy pay was awarded in the net amount claimed. The respondent did not dispute the figure. | Upheld | — | £1,614 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,164
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.