Case 2301737/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Collins v MM! The Party Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301737/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Collins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Collins was employed by MM! The Party Limited as a company manager from 5 December 2021 to 24 February 2022. She originally presented her case as unfair dismissal, but later said she had not intended to pursue that claim and sought to characterise the matter as breach of contract or wrongful dismissal. The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim could not proceed because she did not have the required two years' continuity of service.
The tribunal accepted that any attempt to reframe the case as breach of contract would require a formal amendment. It held that the proposed amendment would be a new claim and was substantially out of time. Applying the strike-out and amendment principles it had set out, the tribunal concluded that there was no reasonable prospect of success in the proposed claim and refused to allow the amendment.
The tribunal also recorded that, even if the matter were approached as a notice-pay claim, the respondent had already paid the claimant eight weeks' notice and the contractual notice period was not less than two weeks. The formal judgment therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant did not have the required two years' continuity of service. It also refused permission to amend the claim to add a breach of contract claim, treating that as a new claim brought out of time and with no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37 strike out
- overriding objective
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.