Case 2301745/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Enumah v Iceland Foods Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301745/2017
- Decision date
- 17 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard
- Venue
- Ashford
- Panel members
- Mr G Anderson, Mr N Phillips
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Enumah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously decided that the Claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and dismissed that claim.
The Tribunal also dismissed the Claimant's claims of direct discrimination on grounds of race and religion, and dismissed the claim for unpaid wages. The Respondent's application for costs was refused.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states the claim of direct discrimination on grounds of race was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states the claim of direct discrimination on grounds of religion was dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unpaid wages and states it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.