Case 2301749/2024 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Miss K Field (2) Miss R Hindmarsh (3) Mr J Foad (4) Miss A Warrington (5) Ms S Daffeh (6) Miss L Jefferson (7) Miss T Cole (8) Mrs K Dennis (9) Miss S Dodds (10) Miss E Hewitt v Aspire Home Carers Ramsgate Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301749/2024
- Decision date
- 29 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Miss K Field (2) Miss R Hindmarsh (3) Mr J Foad (4) Miss A Warrington (5) Ms S Daffeh (6) Miss L Jefferson (7) Miss T Cole (8) Mrs K Dennis (9) Miss S Dodds (10) Miss E Hewitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer, sitting alone at London (South) by CVP on 29 October 2024, considered consolidated claims by ten claimants against Aspire Home Carers Ramsgate Limited. Eight claimants appeared in person; the 7th and 9th claimants did not attend, and the respondent did not attend. The judgment was issued in respect of all eleven case numbers heard together (2301749/2024 to 2301759/2024).
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from each claimant's wages and had failed to pay contractual pension entitlement at the times and in the amounts set out in the schedule annexed to the judgment. The respondent was ordered to pay each claimant the corresponding sums due. The judgment recorded that where payments are made gross, the claimants are responsible for accounting to HMRC for any tax falling due.
For the 1st claimant in this specific case reference (Miss K Field), the tribunal awarded £3,396.70 in unpaid wages for November 2023 and £2,048.73 in unpaid pension contributions, giving a total of £5,445.43.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages for November 2023 in respect of the 1st claimant, Miss K Field. The respondent did not attend. | Upheld | — | £3,397 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay contractual pension entitlement to the 1st claimant, Miss K Field. Classified as breach_of_contract because the tribunal characterised it as a failure to pay 'contractual pension entitlement' rather than a statutory wages deduction. | Upheld | — | £2,049 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,445
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.