Case 2301751/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Poulloura v Professionals in Property Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301751/2021
- Decision date
- 10 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Poulloura
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 12 May 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,083.33 gross. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any amounts owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
The judgment records a single total payment of £2,083.33 and does not provide any separate breakdown into different heads of loss or a separate remedy allocation for any other claim type.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and awards £2,083.33 gross. No separate split between causes of action is given. | Upheld | — | £2,083 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,083
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.