Case 2301759/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301759/2018
- Decision date
- 8 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms S Dengate, Mr A Peart
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London South on 4 to 8 October 2021 before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish with lay members Ms S Dengate and Mr A Peart, gave a unanimous judgment in Ms S Walker v East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust. It dismissed the claimant’s automatic unfair dismissal claim under s.99 ERA 1996 and her pregnancy discrimination claim under s.18 EQA 2010.
The tribunal found that the claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under s.1 ERA was well founded and awarded £998.00 compensation. It also found the wrongful dismissal claim well founded and awarded £1,116.00 compensation, stated to represent three weeks’ notice pay that had not been paid.
The extracted text contains no fuller reasons beyond those outcomes and awards. No separate basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings award, or interest is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim brought pursuant to s.99 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Pregnancy discrimination claim brought pursuant to s.18 EQA 2010. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a written statement contrary to s.1 ERA succeeded; the tribunal awarded £998 compensation. | Upheld | — | £998 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal claim succeeded; the tribunal awarded £1,116 compensation representing three weeks' notice pay not paid. | Upheld | — | £1,116 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,114
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.