Case 2301769/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Claimant v Swift v The Chief Constable of Kent Police — 2022

Case reference: 2301769/2021
Decision date: 12 December 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Truscott KC
Venue: London South

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Swift v The Chief Constable of Kent Police

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This case was listed as an open preliminary hearing at London South on 12 December 2022 before Employment Judge Truscott KC. The claimant was Ms V Swift and the respondent was The Chief Constable of Kent Police.

The tribunal recorded that the claims of sex discrimination, victimisation, and detriment for making a protected disclosure were withdrawn by the claimant. The parties agreed that those claims should be dismissed on withdrawal.

No substantive findings on liability were made and no remedy was awarded. The judgment is procedural only and records disposal of the listed claims by withdrawal and dismissal by consent.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	The claimant intimated that this claim was withdrawn, and the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal by agreement of the parties.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Victimisation	The claimant intimated that this claim was withdrawn, and the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal by agreement of the parties.	Dismissed	—	—
Whistleblowing	Recorded as a detriment claim for making a protected disclosure; it was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed by the tribunal by agreement.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.