Case 2301785/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Ghada Al-Naimi v Buildmaster Construction Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301785/2022
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Ghada Al-Naimi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Ghada Al-Naimi brought a claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 1 October 2021 to 24 May 2022. The tribunal found that she had been employed by Buildmaster Construction Services Ltd as Company Secretary since 10 July 2002, was paid monthly in arrears, and that her proper gross salary at the material time was £2,400 per month. It found there was no written contract or written statement of terms, and no written document showing any agreed variation of salary.
The respondent's case was that the claimant's wages varied with hours worked and that she had verbally agreed to a reduction because of reduced work during the Covid-19 period. The tribunal rejected that case. It found that the payslips showed the salary had generally remained static apart from limited earlier periods not material to the claim, and that there was nothing in writing evidencing consent to or notification of a pay reduction. It therefore found that what was properly payable had not been paid in full between October 2021 and May 2022.
The tribunal calculated that eight months' salary at £2,400 per month came to £19,200, while the claimant had actually received £9,450, made up of monthly payments of £1,050 in October, November, December 2021 and January and February 2022, and £1,400 in March, April and May 2022. The shortfall was therefore £9,750. The tribunal held that this shortfall amounted to a series of unauthorised deductions within Part II of the 1996 Act and awarded the claimant £9,750 gross payable by the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned alleged underpayment of salary from 1 October 2021 to 24 May 2022. Tribunal found the claimant's properly payable gross salary was £2,400 per month, found no written agreement or written variation reducing pay, and held the shortfall was a series of unauthorised deductions. | Upheld | — | £9,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,750
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 23 ERA 1996
- Bear Scotland Ltd and others v Fulton and others; Hertel (UK) Ltd v Woods and others; Amec Group Ltd v Law and others
- Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and Northern Ireland Policing Board v Agnew and others
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.