Case 2301790/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sahi v Eason Group UK & Ireland — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301790/2019
- Decision date
- 18 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sahi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Khalil considered the claimant’s further information, including correspondence from ADL Advanced Contractors. On that material, the tribunal found that Mr M Sahi’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded against Eason Group UK & Ireland.
The judgment records a single monetary award of £5,050. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the extracted text, and the decision does not identify any additional remedy components or legal tests. It is a short liability and remedy determination based on the documents before the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal considered the claimant’s further information, including correspondence from ADL Advanced Contractors, and found the claim for unauthorised deductions succeeded. The claimant was awarded £5,050. | Upheld | — | £5,050 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,050
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.