Case 2301794/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Krzysztof Grula (C1) Malgorzata Chromczak (C2) v GLF Catering Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301794/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Krzysztof Grula (C1) Malgorzata Chromczak (C2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Balogun found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the wages of both claimants, Krzysztof Grula and Malgorzata Chromczak. The judgment records that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the wages of C1 and C2.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay C1 £998.50 and C2 £998.50. It also stated that those sums were subject to deductions for tax and national insurance, as appropriate. No other claims, legal tests, or factual findings are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the wages of C1 and ordered payment of £998.50, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £999 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the wages of C2 and ordered payment of £998.50, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £999 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,997
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.