Case 2301794/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v EBS Systems Limited (In administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301794/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that on 17 January 2022 it wrote to the claimant, Mr N Byrne, explaining that the respondent, EBS Systems Ltd (in administration), was in administration and that the proceedings could not continue without the administrator's consent. The proceedings were stayed and the claimant was told to decide whether to seek the administrator's consent or apply to the Court for it.
On 1 September 2022 the Tribunal wrote again because the claimant had not told the Tribunal whether the necessary consent had been obtained. It proposed to strike out the claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued and gave the claimant 14 days to explain why that should not happen.
No reply was received. The Tribunal said it was apparent that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim and therefore struck it out. The judgment contains no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to respond to correspondence about the respondent's administration and the need for consent to continue proceedings. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.