Case 2301795/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Chandraharan v St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301795/2020
- Decision date
- 27 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Chandraharan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 27 May 2021, Employment Judge Webster sat alone via CVP at London South Employment Tribunal. By consent, the respondent’s name was amended to St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and any claims against the individual respondent, Ms Jacqueline Totterdell, were dismissed.
The tribunal did not determine at this stage whether the case was one of constructive unfair dismissal or unfair dismissal, stating that this was a matter of fact for the final tribunal. The hearing therefore did not resolve the underlying substantive employment claims.
The claimant’s application to amend was only partly allowed. Additional information at paragraph 21(a) was permitted only for the matters identified as k, p, q and r. The proposed changes at l, m, n, o, s and t were refused, and the remaining changes were allowed only on the basis that they clarified existing heads of claim and did not create new causes of action.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | By consent, any claims against the individual respondent, Ms Jacqueline Totterdell, were dismissed. The judgment did not determine the merits of the substantive claims at this hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.