Case 2301798/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Francesca Cooney v Prisoners’ Education Trust Paper determinati — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301798/2023
- Decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Francesca Cooney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a paper determination by Employment Judge Ord. The tribunal struck out all complaints because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal’s orders of 19 September 2023, which were sent to the parties on 22 September 2023, and had not actively pursued her claims.
No merits findings were made. The judgment records only the strike-out decision and that the full merits hearing listed for 23 to 25 September 2024 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that all complaints were struck out; the extracted text does not separately list the pleaded claim heads, but the case listing includes public interest disclosure. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all complaints were struck out; the extracted text does not separately list the pleaded claim heads, but the case listing includes unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all complaints were struck out; the extracted text does not separately list the pleaded claim heads, but the case listing includes unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.