Case 2301810/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Chuma-Opara v Evelyn 190 Centre — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301810/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Chuma-Opara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 4 May 2020. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal recorded that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £8,000.01 gross. It also recorded that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,035.60 net.
The total sum ordered was £10,035.61.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £8,000.01 gross. | Upheld | — | £8,000 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay £2,035.60 net. | Upheld | — | £2,036 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,036
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.