Case 2301813/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Key v The Ship At Conyer Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301813/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Key
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 24 February 2022 before Employment Judge Keogh, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The written decision does not set out any merits findings on that claim beyond the record of withdrawal.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's remaining claims of unfair dismissal and notice pay would proceed to a final hearing. No liability findings, legal analysis, or remedy assessment are given in this decision for those claims.
The judgment is a short procedural decision only. It records the withdrawal of the holiday pay claim and leaves the unfair dismissal and notice pay claims outstanding for later determination.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The written record states that the claimant's holiday pay claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that this claim would proceed to a final hearing; no substantive determination is recorded in this decision. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to 'notice pay' as a remaining claim to proceed to a final hearing; no substantive determination is recorded in this decision. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.