Case 2301814/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Treacy v Zoom Transport Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301814/2021
- Decision date
- 26 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Treacy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined on the papers.
The tribunal found that Zoom Transport Services Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr S Treacy's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £911.40 gross in respect of those deductions.
The judgment also states that the respondent must pay Mr Treacy £914.40 in total. No further breakdown of that total was given in the extracted text, and no separate legal test or additional claim type was identified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 21; the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £911.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £911 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £914
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.