Case 2301817/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Blitz, counsel v Precision Accountancy (Kent) Ltd and 1 other — 2017
- Case reference
- 2301817/2017
- Decision date
- 31 October 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wallis JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Blitz, counsel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment records only procedural case management outcomes. The claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The claim against the First Respondent was stayed until 15 December 2017, with liberty to apply.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying employment claims, and it does not contain any monetary award or legal test. It is limited to the order made by Employment Judge Wallis on 31 October 2017.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claim against the First Respondent was stayed until 15 December 2017, with liberty to apply. No merits decision is recorded in this short judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.