Case 2301826/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A. Durno v GL Education Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301826/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A. Durno
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South via CVP on 3 to 6 April 2023 before Employment Judge T.R. Smith. The claimant, Mr A. Durno, was represented by Mr Oulton and the respondent, GL Education Group Limited, was represented by Mr Graham.
In the judgment issued on 6 April 2023, the tribunal recorded a single substantive outcome: the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. The written record does not set out additional factual findings or a separate remedy assessment.
The judgment also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless either party requested them within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision. On the text supplied, no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.