Case 2301826/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Jankularova v Wilson James Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301826/2021
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs A Jankularova
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had worked for OCS Group UK Limited at Gatwick Airport and was on maternity leave when, in April 2019, she applied for a job with Wilson James Limited through Optime Group Limited. The tribunal found that the job offer was withdrawn on 8 May 2019, after which the claimant sought to continue working for OCS. It also found that the claimant had already brought proceedings against OCS in August 2019, where she referred to the 'negative information' said to have led to the withdrawal of the new job offer, but she did not add Wilson James or Optime Group as respondents at that stage.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found the claim was presented about 20 months out of time and refused to extend time under section 123 Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Paragraph 23 of the judgment text reads 'pregnancy or civil partnership discrimination'; in context the claim related to maternity leave and the withdrawal of the job offer, so this has been treated as a pregnancy/maternity discrimination claim. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal found the claim was presented about 20 months out of time and refused to extend time under section 123 Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 140B Equality Act 2010
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] IRLR 434
- Chief Constable of Lincolnshire v Caston [2010] IRLR 327
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 23
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.