Case 2301832/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Querquouri v Pan Haus Leisure Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301832/2024
- Decision date
- 10 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Querquouri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Croydon by video on 10 July 2024 before Employment Judge Leith. The claimant, Mr H Querquouri, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Pan Haus Leisure Limited, was represented by its director, Mr May.
The judgment states that the claims were dismissed following the claimant's non-attendance at the hearing. It does not record substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claims. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note attached to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following the claimant's non-attendance at the hearing; the judgment does not set out separate findings on the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following the claimant's non-attendance at the hearing; the judgment does not set out separate findings on the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.