Case 2301839/2021 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance For the v Orange Genie Cover Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301839/2021
- Decision date
- 18 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K White brought a claim of unlawful deduction from wages against Orange Genie Cover Limited. Her complaint was that she did not understand how her pay was calculated and that the Respondent made deductions including its margin, employment costs, holiday pay and the apprenticeship levy before arriving at her net pay. She compared the Respondent's payslips with those from another agency which she found easier to follow.
Neither party attended the hearing, and the Employment Judge dealt with the claim on the papers after considering the Claimant's contract, wage slips and the Respondent's written explanation of the pay calculation. The Judge concluded that the issue could be determined justly without oral evidence.
The tribunal found that the deductions complained of were not deductions from the Claimant's wages or salary. They were deductions from the sum charged to the end user of her services, and the Claimant's wages were the amount left after those deductions had been made. The only deduction shown on the Claimant's payslip and made from her pay was income tax, which the tribunal said was a lawful and necessary deduction for the employer to make.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the Claimant had not been subjected to any unlawful deductions from her pay and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.