Case 2301844/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Jakub Hajduk v Golden Houses Developments Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301844/2021
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Krepski Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jakub Hajduk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place on 2 March 2022 at London South via CVP before Employment Judge Krepski. The Claimant did not attend. The judgment records that, because the Claimant failed to attend, his claim was dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the underlying dispute, and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the text provided; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. The claim was dismissed because the Claimant failed to attend the hearing, under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.