Case 2301845/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stuart Burdon v Greener Energy Heating Limited T/A Abbey Boilers — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301845/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson
- Panel members
- Ms S Dengate, Mr T Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stuart Burdon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in London South by video on 17 September 2024, before Employment Judge N Wilson with Ms S Dengate and Mr T Roberts as non-legal members, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's case against Greener Energy Heating Limited T/A Abbey Boilers. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal decided that, because the claimant had failed to materially comply with the Unless Order made by Employment Judge King on 29 August 2024, the claim stood struck out. The written judgment states that the claim was accordingly dismissed.
The decision does not record any determination on the substantive merits of the underlying claim(s), and no remedy was awarded. The only further procedural direction recorded is that any application by the respondent for costs was to be made by 8 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers generically to 'the claimant's claim' and states that, because the claimant failed to materially comply with the Unless Order of Employment Judge King dated 29 August 2024, the claim stands struck out and is accordingly dismissed. The extracted text does not identify the underlying causes of action in the judgment itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.