Case 2301846/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr C Lockitt v Dignity Funerals Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2301846/2019
Decision date: 27 September 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Davies Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Lockitt

Respondent

Dignity Funerals Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This judgment dealt with case management following withdrawal. Mr C Lockitt withdrew three disability-related claims: discrimination arising from disability in respect of an alleged back condition, failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of the alleged back condition, and failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of dyslexia. The tribunal dismissed those claims following the withdrawal.

The judgment also records that the remaining claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability in respect of dyslexia, and wrongful dismissal would proceed. No merits findings or remedy were recorded in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal; claim described as discrimination arising from disability in respect of an alleged back condition.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal; claim described as failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of the alleged back condition.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal; claim described as failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of the disability of dyslexia.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.