Case 2301855/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. V. Lomas v Mr and Mrs M. and M. Hillery — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301855/2021
- Decision date
- 3 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London south via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. V. Lomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms V. Lomas, brought complaints of breach of contract and failure to pay holiday pay against Mr and Mrs M. and M. Hillery. The case was heard at London south via CVP on 3 February 2022 before Employment Judge T.R. Smith, with both parties appearing in person.
The tribunal held that the breach of contract complaint, identified in the judgment as a failure to pay full contractual notice, was well-founded. It ordered the respondents to pay the claimant £903.85. The complaint of failure to pay holiday pay was found not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £904 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £904
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.