Case 2301860/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Valeriu Rotaru v Renewable Energy Supplies Limited (in liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301860/2022
- Decision date
- 17 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rea Representation
- Venue
- London South ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Valeriu Rotaru
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Valeriu Rotaru brought a claim against Renewable Energy Supplies Limited (in liquidation) for unlawful deductions from wages. The case was heard at London South ET by CVP on 10 January 2023 before Employment Judge Rea, and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deductions from wages claim. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Rotaru £700 gross. The judgment also records that Mr Rotaru is responsible for accounting to HMRC for any income tax and National Insurance deductions due on that sum.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.