Case 2301861/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Boksh v Abellio London Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301861/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Boksh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed without notice after failing to report an incident involving a near miss or possible contact with a third party vehicle while driving a bus. The tribunal found the respondent had a conduct reason for dismissal and had carried out a reasonably fair investigation, including proceeding without photographs and not checking the bus for damage in circumstances where the collision allegation had been dropped.
The tribunal found that it was reasonable to conclude there had been a near miss that ought to have been reported. However, it found that failure to report a near miss could not reasonably be treated as gross misconduct under the respondent's policies, which referred to failure to report a collision or injury. The disciplinary decision-maker did not properly consider mitigation including the claimant's clean disciplinary record, length of service, previous reporting of incidents, and his indication that he would report such incidents in future.
The appeal did not cure those failings because the appeal officer also treated failure to report a near miss as gross misconduct and did not properly consider whether dismissal was too severe. The tribunal concluded that dismissal was outside the band of reasonable responses and was both procedurally and substantively unfair. It made no Polkey reduction, but found contributory fault and directed that any compensatory award be reduced by 10%, with remedy and reinstatement to be determined at a later hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim. An application to amend to add wrongful dismissal was refused, so wrongful dismissal was not determined as a substantive claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Elston v Robbie's Photographic Ltd
- Burdett v Aviva Employment Services Ltd
- Bowater v NW London Hospital Trust
- Newbound v Thames Water Utilities Ltd
- Paul v East Surrey District Health Authority
- Foley v Post Office
- Polkey
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.