Case 2301871/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Benson v Boxed Freeze Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301871/2020
- Decision date
- 4 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett London
- Venue
- London South
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr B Benson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal consolidated claims 2301871/20, 2301557/20 and 2302339/20. No response had been presented by either respondent, and no documentation was provided. After hearing from the claimant and considering a 34-page bundle, Employment Judge Beckett sitting alone applied rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and held that the first respondent was the claimant's employer at all material times. The judgment also recorded that the respondents made the claimant redundant on 24 March 2020, that Boxed Freeze Ltd appeared on the claimant's payslips, and that Cooler Tech Ltd had originally employed the claimant and appeared on bank statements as paying wages in March 2020.
The tribunal awarded £2,333.47 for pay arrears for February and March 2020 and £3,425.63 for pay arrears from March 2019 to February 2020, the latter being described in the judgment as unlawful deductions from wages. It also awarded £3,080.00 for notice pay, £4,620.00 as a statutory redundancy payment, and £1,760 for the failure to provide written particulars of employment. The first respondent was ordered to pay £15,219.10 gross, the claimant was required to account to HMRC in respect of the award, and the judgment states that recoupment did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as pay arrears for February and March 2020. | Upheld | — | £2,333 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded in respect of pay arrears from March 2019 to February 2020; the judgment describes this as unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,426 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay. | Upheld | — | £3,080 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £4,620 |
| Other | Payment for not being provided with written particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,760 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,219
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.